"Hateful and spineless, raped and robbed, mangled and witless, they were as good as we are, you can say that again! We never change. Neither our socks nor our masters nor our opinions, or we're so slow about it that it's no use. We were born loyal, and that's what killed us! Soldiers free of charge, heroes for everyone else, talking monkeys, tortured words, we are the minions of King Misery; He's our lord and master! When we misbehave, he tightens his grip … his fingers are around our neck, that makes it hard to talk, got to be careful if we want to eat … For nothing at all he'll choke you … It's not a life …"

Humans are innately wicked and incapable of kindness, according to misanthropy. This viewpoint has existed since antiquity. It was common among theologians in the Middle Ages who thought that God would punish humanity for sins against Him. Since then, many religious leaders have pushed the idea that people are essentially evil and that only divine intervention can save them. Some individuals still think that humans are inherently evil and that only God can save them.

Louis-Ferdinand Céline uses the literary technique of the unreliable narrator in his book Journey to the End of the Night to convey a misanthropic perspective of humanity in the first person. He demonstrates to the reader, in a seemingly appealing manner, that it is feasible to examine a difficult concept using strong pictures and metaphors.

The narrator of the book recounts his life in a succession of stories about his dislike for other people. The protagonist is often ridiculed, deceived, and even assaulted by other people. The author argues in a semi-autobiographical manner that the narrator is not a trustworthy guide since he despises mankind. The reader is free to disagree, but Céline claims that this is a reflection of the fundamentally imperfect human state.

In order to comprehend the narrator's misanthropic viewpoint, the novel's historical background must also be examined. The popularity of concepts linked to Social Darwinism and eugenics grew throughout the interwar era between World Wars I and II. These beliefs will eventually lead to the Nazis' mass murders.

This historical era influenced the author. Louis-Ferdinand was conscripted to fight in World War I and was wounded many times on the front lines, resulting in long-term health issues. This book was influenced by his experiences during the war and afterwards with his fellow soldiers.

The piece may be read in a variety of ways. One approach is as a critique of war's and military training's dehumanising consequences. The protagonist suffers physical and emotional trauma, which causes him to become a misanthrope. The war is contrasted with civilian life, which is often seen as dull and lifeless in compared to wartime experiences.

It's also possible to see the piece as a societal satire. The events that occur are sometimes beyond the characters' control. The protagonist's experience in a French colony, for example, is very different from his experiences on the Western Front during World War I. Characters who are "civilised" are occasionally just as horrible as those who are "uncivilised." In other words, the civilised world is shown to be utterly ridiculous, with only the so-called "savages" having their act together.

The main character's misanthropic outlook is strongly linked to this reading of the book. All of his bad experiences and tragic occurrences have left him feeling lonely and alone. To put it another way, humanity is a species of animals that only know how to kill one another. Love, on the other hand, is a rare and enigmatic feeling that does not comprehend — or, at the very least, is unable to confront — the facts of the world. He expressed himself as follows:

"Love is harder to give up than life. In this world we spend our time killing or adoring, or both together. "I hate you! I adore you!" We keep going, we fuel and refuel, we pass on our life to a biped of the next century, with frenzy, at any cost, as if it were the greatest of pleasures to perpetuate ourselves, as if, when all's said and done, it would make us immortal. One way or another, kissing is as indispensable as scratching."

The phrase alone demonstrates how unusual and experimental Céline's writing was for her period. He does such a fantastic job at putting a personal twist on each phrase that it seems like a human, not a writer, is speaking to you.

Throughout the novel, the reader feels a feeling of loss. It tells the tale of a newly returned army doctor from World War I. He finds it difficult to adjust to French society, which is quite different from what he was used to during the war.

The book is chock-full of repulsive people and events. It's as if Céline is admonishing the reader not to go down a dark alley; an encouragement to turn away from the book's substance. It's 'disgusting' because of the horrific events that occur to the characters, not because of the writing style. The book presents a compelling argument for the existence of evil in the world and the absurdity of life. The primary subject of this piece is a pessimistic perspective on life.

I've never read something so disgusting and vulgar while yet being so clever. The writing isn't up to par with what you'd expect from a writer in this era. Céline takes a crass attitude, yet it manages to be exquisite at the same time. Vulgar actions are substituted for regular narrative elements, and vulgar insults are employed in lieu of adjectives. It is by far one of the most fascinating novels I have ever read, despite the fact that it is not the simplest to read.

Pessimism and cynicism are ingrained in French culture and society, and they come as no surprise to me. HoweI was surprised to discover them in such large numbers in this book. Nonetheless, given the circumstances, these characteristics are appropriate. A tale about love and sacrifice in the middle of a world at war may seem like the makings of a poor romantic drama, yet Céline manages to portray this subject in a dark, twisted way. It's not only appealing to the eye, but it's also historically correct. The historical events weaved into the narrative are neither twisted or glorified in any way. Instead, they're utilised to add to the bleakness of an otherwise depressing tale.

Céline manages to provide his readers a comprehensive view into pre-WW1 France and the consequences of the Great War in such a short amount of time. He not only provides us a visual representation of the war's victims and weaponry, but he also gives us a firsthand account through the eyes of a young, impressionable medical student.

The gloomy backdrop of war and the atrocities that accompany it may be difficult to read at times, but his comic aspects and caustic wit make it palatable.

Bardamu, the protagonist, is an intriguing character since he is a talented physician with a bright future in medicine, yet he decides to join as a front-line soldier out of ignorance and pure curiosity. This character weakness, in my view, is what keeps the narrative intriguing. The typical reader may put himself or herself into the narrative to some extent.

Céline maintains his grasp on the broad picture while incorporating a personal touch into the narrative. He is able to demonstrate that, despite our technical advancements, we are still the same species of creatures we have always been.

The language of Journey to the End of the Night is one of the most notable distinctions between it and other books. Céline has a distinct writing style in which he recounts events in extremely vivid, casual language while maintaining a certain degree of elegance. He will often use overly complicated wording to describe a basic item or occurrence. He may even use crude words to describe a formal situation at times. This, however, is not done haphazardly; rather, it is done with meticulous precision.

The tale is written in a very personal manner, as I previously said. This is one of the things that sets it apart from other books. It has a tone that is almost conversational. However, there is a feeling of impending doom underneath this casual tone. This is a critical aspect of the narrative. You get the feeling that something is going to go wrong as you read. This gloomy atmosphere heightens the significance of the primary concept. Specifically, that all men's efforts are eventually worthless.

I observed many reasons that were used to excuse unethical behaviour while reading this book. Patriotism, religion, and even love are examples. Each reason in the narrative becomes corrupted over time, and its original purpose is forgotten. The cause is sometimes tainted by the unscrupulous people that lead it. At other instances, the cause has been tainted by mankind's own wickedness. In any event, man is unable to escape his predicament, and every effort to do so ends in agony and despair. The tale may be sad in this regard, but it is also important. We cannot go ahead in the world if we dismiss our previous errors.

Unlike Camus's The Plague, this tale does not provide the comfort that comes with accepting one's destiny. One of the most compelling aspects of this tale is the lack of optimism. It cautions us about the risks of wishful thinking and overconfidence. It's a valuable tale for our time in this manner. We need to be reminded that as the world becomes quicker and more linked, we are all vulnerable to the ravages of time. We need to be reminded that our lives are short as men embrace technology and science. As politicians continue to squabble, it's important to remember that their arguments are meaningless.

The tale "Journey to the End of the Night" talks about the meaninglessness of existence. It demonstrates that life is a futile battle, mocking our ideals, aspirations, and ambitions. Most significantly, it serves as a reminder that we all have no higher significance or purpose in life. Céline expresses his dissatisfaction with life as follows:

"A time comes when you're all alone, when you've come to the end of everything that can happen to you. It's the end of the world. Even grief, your own grief, doesn't answer you anymore, and you have to retrace your steps, to go back among people, it makes no difference who. You're not choosy at times like that, because even to weep you have to go back where everything starts all over, back among people."

"Even grief, your own grief, doesn't answer you anymore," is arguably one of book's saddest and most poignant lines. It encapsulates the human condition's feeling of despair, helplessness, and desperation.

While Céline's work has been characterised as a "manic rejection of despair," we all share a feeling of futility. There is no higher reason for us to exist. We shall all die, and our deeds, good or bad, will ultimately be meaningless. We can only expect to find joy in the brief moments of our life at best. From monks in dimly lit monasteries to rock stars in concert halls, it is a strong subject that has been conveyed via the arts in different ways. It's a topic that will never go out of style as long as people live on our planet.

The book is a product of its period, and it is at times very startling. Although the language is simple, it is not an easy read. The majority of words may be deduced from their context. It was composed during a time when the world appeared to be going to hell and there seemed to be no way out. That, I believe, is why it seems so timely today.

Finally, Céline was a gifted writer who, regrettably, succumbed to hate and despair. His anti-Semitism was undoubtedly inspired by his historical period, but it cannot be justified. This historical background must be taken into account while reading his book. I think that the defence can make a compelling argument based on free speech and artistic value.

Regardless, I continue to respect Céline as a writer. His frenetic energy is palpable in his writings, and he really lived what he wrote. His cathartic cries against an oppressive society reverberate through the pages and make an indelible impact on the reader. Many others before and after him shared his hate and disdain for mankind. He is really damned, but he does it so well.