Python's ecosystem is vast and vibrant, with over 400,000 packages on PyPI. This abundance of libraries is both a blessing and a curse — while you can find packages for almost any task, it's increasingly difficult to separate the genuinely useful tools from overrated options that waste your time.
Having built dozens of production Python applications across various domains, I've found that many popular libraries don't deliver on their promises, adding unnecessary complexity, maintenance burden, and performance issues to your projects.
Let's examine eight Python libraries that, despite their popularity, often create more problems than they solve — and what you should use instead.
1. Requests: Stuck in the Synchronous Past
# The familiar Requests approach
import requests
def fetch_data(urls):
results = []
for url in urls:
response = requests.get(url)
results.append(response.json())
return resultsWhy it's overrated:
- Entirely synchronous, blocking execution while waiting for responses
- No native async/await support
- Poor performance for multiple requests
- Limited streaming capabilities
- Not actively maintained anymore (in maintenance mode since 2022)
What to use instead:
# Modern approach with httpx
import httpx
import asyncio
async def fetch_data(urls):
async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
tasks = [client.get(url) for url in urls]
responses = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
return [response.json() for response in responses]Better alternatives:
- httpx: Modern HTTP client with both sync and async APIs, great for transitioning
- aiohttp: Mature async HTTP client and server with extensive features
- urllib3: Low-level, powerful HTTP client (what Requests uses under the hood)
Requests was revolutionary when it launched, but it hasn't kept pace with Python's evolution. For modern Python development, especially with services making multiple API calls, async HTTP clients provide significantly better performance and resource utilization.
2. Flask: Too Minimalist for Production
# Typical Flask application
from flask import Flask, request, jsonify
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route('/api/users/<user_id>')
def get_user(user_id):
# Get user from database
user = db.get_user(user_id)
return jsonify(user)
if __name__ == '__main__':
app.run(debug=True)Why it's overrated:
- Requires numerous extensions for basic features (authentication, validation, etc.)
- No standardized project structure
- Limited built-in support for async operations
- Needs substantial configuration for production deployment
- Poor support for larger applications and teams
What to use instead:
# FastAPI example
from fastapi import FastAPI, HTTPException
from pydantic import BaseModel
app = FastAPI()
class User(BaseModel):
id: int
name: str
email: str
@app.get("/api/users/{user_id}", response_model=User)
async def get_user(user_id: int):
user = await db.get_user(user_id)
if not user:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="User not found")
return userBetter alternatives:
- FastAPI: Modern, high-performance framework with automatic docs, validation, and async support
- Django: Comprehensive framework with all the batteries included
- Starlette: Lightweight ASGI framework if you need more control
- Quart: Async reimplementation of Flask's API
Flask is excellent for learning web development concepts and building simple applications. However, for production applications that need to scale, frameworks like FastAPI or Django provide more built-in functionality, better performance, and clearer standards for organizing code.
3. Pandas: The Heavyweight Data Manipulator
# Common Pandas operations
import pandas as pd
def process_user_data(filepath):
# Read entire CSV into memory
df = pd.read_csv(filepath)
# Filter users by age
adult_users = df[df['age'] >= 18]
# Calculate average metrics
avg_metrics = {
'avg_age': adult_users['age'].mean(),
'avg_purchases': adult_users['purchase_count'].mean(),
'avg_revenue': adult_users['total_spent'].mean()
}
return avg_metricsWhy it's overrated:
- Enormous memory usage for larger datasets
- Steep learning curve with inconsistent API
- Slow performance for many operations
- Complex indexing and selection operations
- Challenging to scale beyond single-machine memory
What to use instead:
# CSV processing with standard library
import csv
from statistics import mean
def process_user_data(filepath):
adult_ages = []
adult_purchases = []
adult_revenue = []
with open(filepath, 'r') as file:
reader = csv.DictReader(file)
for row in reader:
age = int(row['age'])
if age >= 18:
adult_ages.append(age)
adult_purchases.append(int(row['purchase_count']))
adult_revenue.append(float(row['total_spent']))
return {
'avg_age': mean(adult_ages),
'avg_purchases': mean(adult_purchases),
'avg_revenue': mean(adult_revenue)
}Better alternatives:
- Standard library (csv, itertools, collections): For many simple data tasks
- polars: Much faster DataFrame library with similar API but better performance
- vaex: For out-of-memory datasets that exceed RAM
- DuckDB: SQL operations on local datasets with excellent performance
- NumPy: For numerical data without the overhead of DataFrames
Pandas is invaluable for interactive data analysis and exploration. However, for data processing in production applications, it often introduces unnecessary overhead. Many data tasks can be accomplished more efficiently with the standard library, SQL databases, or more specialized tools.
4. Beautiful Soup: The Brittle Web Scraper
# Typical Beautiful Soup scraping
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
import requests
def scrape_product_prices(url):
response = requests.get(url)
soup = BeautifulSoup(response.content, 'html.parser')
prices = []
for price_element in soup.select('.product-price'):
prices.append(float(price_element.text.strip('$')))
return pricesWhy it's overrated:
- Struggles with dynamic JavaScript-rendered content
- No built-in handling for rate limiting, retries, or anti-bot measures
- Limited to parsing HTML that's already been fetched
- Slower than alternatives for large documents
- Not designed for resilient, production-grade web scraping
What to use instead:
# Using Playwright for modern web scraping
from playwright.sync_api import sync_playwright
def scrape_product_prices(url):
with sync_playwright() as p:
browser = p.chromium.launch()
page = browser.new_page()
page.goto(url)
# Wait for content to load
page.wait_for_selector('.product-price')
# Extract data using JavaScript in the browser context
prices = page.eval_on_selector_all(
'.product-price',
'elements => elements.map(el => parseFloat(el.innerText.replace("$", "")))'
)
browser.close()
return pricesBetter alternatives:
- Playwright: Complete browser automation with JavaScript rendering support
- Selenium: Similar to Playwright, good for complex web interactions
- Scrapy: Production-grade, extensible scraping framework
- parsel: Lightweight, fast CSS/XPath selector library (used by Scrapy)
- lxml: High-performance XML/HTML parsing
Beautiful Soup is suitable for simple HTML parsing but falls short for modern web scraping. Today's websites are increasingly complex with JavaScript rendering, anti-bot measures, and dynamic content — challenges that require more sophisticated tools designed for web automation rather than just HTML parsing.
5. Virtualenv: The Legacy Environment Manager
# Traditional virtualenv workflow
$ pip install virtualenv
$ virtualenv myproject_env
$ source myproject_env/bin/activate # On Windows: myproject_env\Scripts\activate
$ pip install -r requirements.txtWhy it's overrated:
- Not integrated with the Python interpreter
- Inconsistent activation across different shells and platforms
- No built-in dependency resolution
- Limited lock file capabilities
- No standardized way to manage global vs. local packages
What to use instead:
# Modern approach with Poetry
$ pip install poetry
$ poetry new myproject
$ cd myproject
$ poetry add fastapi uvicorn
# Activate the environment
$ poetry shell
# Or run commands directly
$ poetry run python main.pyBetter alternatives:
- Poetry: Modern dependency management with lock files and virtual environments
- Conda: Comprehensive environment manager that handles non-Python dependencies
- Pipenv: Combines Pipfile and virtual environments
- Python's built-in venv module: For simpler use cases without additional tools
Virtualenv was essential when Python didn't have built-in environment tools, but it's now a legacy approach. Modern tools like Poetry and Conda provide more comprehensive dependency management, better reproducibility, and more consistent workflows across platforms and projects.
6. Matplotlib: The Overcomplicated Visualization Library
# Basic Matplotlib plot with typical boilerplate
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
def create_visualization(data):
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 6))
x = np.arange(len(data))
ax.bar(x, data)
ax.set_title('Data Visualization')
ax.set_xlabel('Categories')
ax.set_ylabel('Values')
ax.set_xticks(x)
ax.set_xticklabels(['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E'])
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig('visualization.png', dpi=300)
plt.close()Why it's overrated:
- Extremely verbose API with inconsistent design
- Difficult to create modern, interactive visualizations
- Poor default styling
- Steep learning curve for basic tasks
- Challenging to integrate with web applications
What to use instead:
# Creating the same visualization with Plotly Express
import plotly.express as px
def create_visualization(data):
categories = ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E']
fig = px.bar(
x=categories,
y=data,
title='Data Visualization',
labels={'x': 'Categories', 'y': 'Values'}
)
fig.write_image('visualization.png')
# Or return interactive HTML
return fig.to_html()Better alternatives:
- Plotly Express: High-level API for interactive visualizations
- Seaborn: Simplified statistical visualizations built on Matplotlib
- Altair: Declarative visualization library based on Vega
- Bokeh: Interactive visualizations for web browsers
- Vega-Altair: Grammar of graphics approach to visualization
Matplotlib is powerful but requires excessive code for basic visualizations. Modern visualization libraries provide more intuitive APIs, better defaults, interactivity, and easier integration with web applications — all with significantly less code.
7. pytest-mock: The Mocking Overhead
# Using pytest-mock in tests
def test_user_service(mocker):
# Set up mocks
mock_db = mocker.patch('app.services.user_service.db')
mock_db.get_user.return_value = {"id": 1, "name": "Test User"}
# Import here to use the mocked version
from app.services.user_service import get_user_by_id
# Test with the mock
result = get_user_by_id(1)
assert result["name"] == "Test User"
mock_db.get_user.assert_called_once_with(1)Why it's overrated:
- Adds a dependency on pytest when the standard library has
unittest.mock - Encourages overly complicated mocking that creates brittle tests
- Often leads to tests that verify implementation details rather than behavior
- Makes test maintenance challenging as code evolves
- Creates tests that pass even when the actual code is broken
What to use instead:
# Using dependency injection and simple standard library tools
from unittest.mock import Mock
def test_user_service():
# Create a mock directly
mock_db = Mock()
mock_db.get_user.return_value = {"id": 1, "name": "Test User"}
# Import the function once
from app.services.user_service import create_user_service
# Create service with explicit dependency injection
user_service = create_user_service(db=mock_db)
# Test behavior, not implementation details
result = user_service.get_user_by_id(1)
assert result["name"] == "Test User"Better alternatives:
- Standard library's unittest.mock: For direct mocking without extra dependencies
- Dependency injection: Design code for testability instead of relying heavily on mocks
- pytest fixtures: For setting up test states without complex mocking
- Actual test doubles: Write simple fake implementations for clean testing
- Contract tests: Verify behavior against real dependencies periodically
Excessive mocking often leads to tests that verify how code works rather than what it does. Modern testing approaches focus on designing for testability, using dependency injection, and testing at appropriate boundaries rather than relying on complex mocking frameworks.
8. PyYAML: The Security-Challenged Parser
# Typical PyYAML usage with security issues
import yaml
def load_config(config_file):
with open(config_file, 'r') as file:
# Unsafe by default!
config = yaml.load(file)
return configWhy it's overrated:
- Unsafe by default with dangerous
load()function - Security vulnerabilities with potential code execution
- Inconsistent API between safe and unsafe loaders
- Performance issues with large YAML files
- Limited validation capabilities
What to use instead:
# Using pydantic with YAML
import yaml
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Optional
class ServerConfig(BaseModel):
host: str
port: int
debug: bool = False
allowed_origins: Optional[List[str]] = None
class Config(BaseModel):
app_name: str
server: ServerConfig
log_level: str = "INFO"
def load_config(config_file):
with open(config_file, 'r') as file:
# Use safe_load, not load
raw_config = yaml.safe_load(file)
# Validate with pydantic
return Config(**raw_config)Better alternatives:
- PyYAML with safe_load + pydantic: For YAML with validation
- strictyaml: A safer, more restricted YAML parser
- toml: Simpler, more predictable format with better Python support
- Python's built-in configparser: For simple configuration needs
- JSON with json.loads: When advanced features aren't needed
PyYAML's default behavior is dangerously insecure, and its more secure options are often overlooked. Modern configuration approaches combine safe parsers with validation libraries like Pydantic to ensure both security and correctness, or use inherently safer formats like TOML.
Making Better Library Choices
The Python ecosystem's diversity means there are usually multiple options for any given task. When evaluating libraries, consider these key factors:
1. Maintenance Activity
Active maintenance is crucial for security and compatibility. Check:
- Recent commits and releases
- Response time to issues and PRs
- Number of open vs. closed issues
- Documentation updates
2. Performance Characteristics
Performance impacts vary greatly between libraries:
- Memory usage patterns
- CPU efficiency
- I/O handling approaches
- Scaling characteristics with larger inputs
3. Design Philosophy
Libraries that align with Python's philosophy tend to integrate better:
- Simplicity and readability
- Explicit over implicit
- Composability with other tools
- Following standard Python patterns
4. Community Health
A strong community provides support and continuity:
- Stack Overflow question volume and quality
- Third-party tutorials and resources
- Alternative implementations and forks
- Commercial support options
5. Dependencies and Footprint
Evaluate the full cost of adoption:
- Size of dependency tree
- Installation complexity
- Impact on deployment and packaging
- Platform compatibility
Conclusion
Being popular doesn't always mean being the best tool for the job. Many widely-used Python libraries have been superseded by more modern, efficient, or secure alternatives. By critically evaluating your technology choices rather than simply following trends, you can build more maintainable and efficient Python applications.
Remember that the best library is often the one you don't need at all — Python's standard library is comprehensive and well-designed. Before adding a dependency, consider whether built-in tools might solve your problem more elegantly.
What other Python libraries do you think are overrated or have better alternatives? Share your experiences in the comments!
Thank you for being a part of the community
Before you go:
- Be sure to clap and follow the writer ️👏️️
- Follow us: X | LinkedIn | YouTube | Newsletter | Podcast | Differ | Twitch
- Check out CoFeed, the smart way to stay up-to-date with the latest in tech 🧪
- Start your own free AI-powered blog on Differ 🚀
- Join our content creators community on Discord 🧑🏻💻
- For more content, visit plainenglish.io + stackademic.com